Skip to main content
Zimmerman Reed stands ready as your partner and advocate in the pursuit of justice. Our attorneys have expertise, experience, and an established history of securing results for our clients against companies across the country. We remain dedicated to advocating for justice and accountability by representing whistleblowers in a diverse array of qui tam / False Claims Act cases.
If you are aware of wrongdoing that has cost taxpayers money, it’s crucial to take action. Zimmerman Reed is here to help you navigate the complex legal process.
By contacting Zimmerman Reed, you’re taking a significant step toward holding those responsible accountable for their actions. We have a proven track record of success in uncovering fraud, building strong cases, and recovering substantial amounts for our clients. If your case results in a recovery of funds for the government, you may be entitled to a percentage of the recovery as a monetary reward.
Our team of experienced legal professionals is ready to listen to your story, evaluate the evidence you have, and provide expert guidance on how to proceed. We understand the importance of justice, and we are committed to working tirelessly on your behalf to ensure the truth comes to light.
Don’t let fraud go unchecked. Your actions could make a real difference in safeguarding taxpayer funds and upholding the law. Contact us today to discuss your case and take the first step toward justice.
What is the False Claims Act?
The False Claims Act is a federal law in the United States designed to combat fraud against the government. It was originally enacted during the Civil War in 1863 by President Abraham Lincoln as a response to widespread fraudulent practices by government contractors. The law has since been amended and updated to address modern issues related to fraud and false claims.
The main objective of the False Claims Act is to encourage individuals with knowledge of fraud against government programs and contracts to come forward and report such fraudulent activities. The law allows private individuals, known as “whistleblowers” or “relators,” to file lawsuits on behalf of the government when they have evidence of false claims or fraudulent behavior. These lawsuits are referred to as “qui tam” actions.
If the lawsuit is successful and results in the recovery of funds for the government, the defendant may be liable to pay triple the damages suffered by the government plus additional civil penalties for each false claim submitted. The whistleblower who initiated the lawsuit may receive a percentage of the recovered amount as an incentive for individuals to expose fraud.
Who can bring a False Claims Act case?
The False Claims Act allows whistleblowers to bring a false claims case on behalf of the government. This provision is designed to encourage individuals with knowledge of fraud against federal or state government programs or contracts to come forward and report such fraudulent activities.
In general, individuals who can bring a False Claims Act case include:
- Individuals who have firsthand knowledge of false claims, fraud, or deceptive practices that have been made to obtain payments or benefits from government programs or contracts.
- Employees, former employees, contractors, and subcontractors of companies or entities involved in government contracts or programs can often be well-positioned to have knowledge of fraudulent activities.
- Individuals with specialized knowledge or expertise in a particular industry may also bring forward False Claims Act cases if they have non-public information about fraudulent activities within that industry.
It’s important to note that False Claims Act cases must meet certain legal requirements and criteria to be successful. The information provided by the whistleblower must be credible, specific, and detailed enough to support an investigation and potential legal action by the government.
It’s recommended that individuals who are considering bringing a False Claims Act case consult with experienced legal professionals who specialize in this area to ensure they understand the process and requirements involved.
Are whistleblowers protected under the False Claims Act?
Whistleblowers are afforded protections under the False Claims Act to encourage them to come forward and report fraud committed against the government. These protections are designed to shield whistleblowers from retaliation and ensure their willingness to expose fraudulent activities. Key protections provided under the FCA include:
- Anti-Retaliation: The FCA includes an anti-retaliation provision that prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who take lawful actions to stop or expose violations of the FCA. If a whistleblower faces retaliation, such as being fired or demoted, they have the right to seek legal remedies. The FCA allows whistleblowers to file a lawsuit seeking reinstatement to their position, double back pay (lost wages and benefits), and other compensatory damages resulting from the retaliation. Whistleblowers may also be entitled to attorney’s fees and costs incurred in pursuing legal action.
- Confidentiality: The FCA allows whistleblowers to initially file qui tam lawsuits under seal, meaning that the lawsuit remains confidential and is not made public initially. This gives the government an opportunity to investigate the allegations before the defendant is made aware of the lawsuit. The seal provision helps protect the whistleblower’s identity and prevents potential retaliation during the early stages of the case.
These protections aim to encourage individuals with knowledge of fraudulent activities to come forward and assist the government in uncovering and prosecuting fraud. The FCA’s provisions help safeguard whistleblowers from potential retaliation and provide incentives for them to report fraudulent claims made against the government.
How are False Claims Act whistleblowers rewarded?
Whistleblowers can potentially receive financial compensation under the False Claims Act for their role in uncovering and reporting fraud. The FCA includes provisions that incentivize whistleblowers to come forward by offering them a share of the funds recovered as a result of their qui tam lawsuits.
When a whistleblower files a qui tam lawsuit on behalf of the government, they are acting as a relator. If the lawsuit is successful, and the government recovers funds from the defendant (usually through a settlement or judgment), the relator may be entitled to receive a portion of the recovered amount as a reward.
The exact percentage of the reward depends on various factors, including the extent of the whistleblower’s contribution to the case and whether the government decides to intervene or join the lawsuit. Typically, if the government intervenes and takes an active role in the litigation, the whistleblower’s reward can range from 15% to 25% of the recovered funds. If the government does not intervene, and the whistleblower continues to litigate the case independently, the reward may increase to between 25% and 30% of the recovered funds.
The FCA’s reward provisions are intended to compensate and incentivize whistleblowers for the risks, time, and effort they invest in bringing forth allegations of fraud on behalf of the government. It recognizes their contribution to uncovering fraudulent activities and encourages individuals with knowledge of fraud to step forward and assist in recovering funds for the government.
It’s important to note that the actual reward amount is determined by the court based on several factors, including the whistleblower’s cooperation, the significance of their information, the quality of their evidence, and the overall success of the case. Consulting with an attorney experienced in False Claims Act cases, such as the attorneys at Zimmerman Reed, can provide more specific guidance on the potential rewards available in a particular situation.
What types of fraud can be addressed by a False Claims Act case?
False Claims Act cases cover a wide range of fraudulent activities involving government funds or programs. Here are some examples of types of fraud commonly seen in FCA cases:
- Healthcare Fraud: This includes submitting false claims for reimbursement to government healthcare programs like Medicare or Medicaid. Examples of healthcare fraud can involve billing for services not rendered, billing for unnecessary procedures or tests, or upcoding (billing for a more expensive service than what was provided).
- Defense Contractor Fraud: This involves fraudulent activities by contractors who provide goods or services to the government for defense purposes. It can include overbilling, providing defective products, falsifying certifications, or inflating costs.
- Procurement Fraud: Procurement fraud occurs when individuals or companies engage in fraudulent activities during the government contracting process. This can involve bid-rigging, kickbacks, false certifications, or providing substandard goods or services.
- Grant Fraud: Grant fraud occurs when individuals or organizations misrepresent information or misuse grant funds received from the government. Examples include fabricating research results, using grant funds for personal expenses, or submitting false reports to obtain or maintain grant funding.
- Education Fraud: Education fraud involves false claims made by educational institutions that receive government funds, such as student loan programs or education grants. This can include misrepresenting student enrollment numbers, falsifying academic records, or providing false information to obtain financial aid.
- Mortgage and Housing Fraud: This includes fraudulent activities related to government-insured mortgages, such as FHA or VA loans. Examples can include false appraisals, misrepresenting borrower qualifications, or failing to comply with program requirements.
- COVID-19 Fraud: This includes false claims or deceptive practices to obtain government funds or benefits, including businesses falsely claiming eligibility to receive COVID-19 relief funds such as Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans.
These are just a few examples, and the scope of FCA cases can extend to various industries and government programs.
What should I do if I have a False Claims Act case?
If you are aware of fraud against the government, it is important to take timely steps to protect your right and pursue justice before any applicable statutes of limitations can preclude your claim. Here’s how to initiate a consultation with the False Claims Act attorneys at Zimmerman Reed:
- Contact Us: Begin by reaching out to Zimmerman Reed. You can call our office or fill out our form at the link here. Our knowledgeable staff is ready to assist you and answer any initial questions you may have.
- Initial Consultation: This consultation is your opportunity to share the details of your potential False Claims Act case. We’ll listen carefully to your story, understand your concerns, and gather information about the alleged fraudulent activities.
- Case Evaluation: Our experienced attorneys will evaluate the information you provide during the consultation. We’ll assess the strength of your case, the evidence you have, and the potential legal avenues to pursue. Based on the evaluation, we’ll determine the viability of your False Claims Act case. We’ll discuss the likelihood of success, the potential recovery, and the strategies we might employ.
Based on our evaluation, we will then advise you on the best steps forward to achieve the best result for you.
At Zimmerman Reed, we are dedicated to championing justice and holding wrongdoers accountable through our expertise in False Claims Act cases. Contact us today to schedule your initial consultation and take the first step toward making a difference by exposing fraud and protecting taxpayer dollars.
Contact Us Now